- R L Zimmern, director
- Public Health Genetics Unit, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge CB1 4RN
With aching hands and bleeding feet
We dig and heap, lay stones on stone;
We bear the burden and the heat
Of the long day, and wish t'were done.
Not till the hours of light return
All we have built we do discern.
Matthew Arnold
The promise of the human genome project to transform biology and medicine is alluring. To document the sequence of bases, three billion in total, that make up the building blocks of human DNA is a formidable task requiring not only the knowledge and skills of the biochemist, geneticist, and molecular biologist but also the technological expertise of engineers and information scientists. Detailed genetic maps have already been constructed to resolutions of 1-2 centimorgans (cM),1 and physical mapping has resulted in the integration into the genetic map of over 30 000 genes.2 Similar efforts have led to the complete sequencing of smaller organisms, such as the bacterium Escherichia coli, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the worm Caenorhabditis elegans, many parts of which are homologues of sequences in the human genome.
New goals for the US Human Genome Project were defined in October 1998.3 These have included a commitment to complete a third of the human sequence and a “working draft” to cover 90% of the genome by 2001. The whole genome will be sequenced by 2003, two years in advance on the original target date. Sequencing technology will be improved and speeded up, and costs of sequencing each base pair will be reduced from current levels of $0.50 to an expected $0.25 within the next five years. There will be a drive to identify sequence variation, particularly single base pair differences (known as single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs), and to develop technologies for their rapid, large scale identification in populations. An …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012