A principle to die forBMJ 1999; 319 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7219.1277 (Published 06 November 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:1277
- Susan Pocklington, general practitioner
- Exmouth, Devon
“You'd die for a principle, Sue,” was a remark made to me in another context, but which came to mind recently. On this occasion I had just appeared before a tribunal which was investigating the possible missed diagnosis of a suspended colleague. It had not been a pleasant experience. I was not so naive as to think that it would be, but I had not expected to find my own clinical competence under attack. Nor had I expected to be questioned in detail about a case without the benefit of the case notes. As I protested to the chair at the time, I do not think you should be expected to speak from memory in a court of law.
When asked to speak on behalf of my colleague I realised that there might be some discomfort, that my relationships with the colleagues making the accusation might be compromised. Indeed, I heard of other general practitioners who had …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Sign up for a free trial