Underestimates of consumption are possible
- Martin Ashton-Key, specialist registrar in public health (martin.ashton-key@portsha.swest.nhs.uk),
- Margaret Ashton-Key, consultant histopathologist (margaret.ashton-key@brighton-healthcare.com)
- Portsmouth and South East Hampshire Health Authority, Portsmouth
- Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton BN2 5BE
- Danish Epidemiology Science Centre at the Institute of Preventive Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kommunehospitalet, DK-1399 Copenhagen K, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RZ
- Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR
- West of Scotland Cancer Surveillance Unit, University of Glasgow
- University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
EDITOR—Hart et al say that the mortality curve in relation to alcohol consumption may not be U shaped or J shaped once socioeconomic and confounding factors are taken into account.1 We should like to raise concerns about the estimates of weekly alcohol consumption used, in particular by taking one bottle of wine to be equivalent to six units of alcohol. This value is only true for a 750 ml bottle of wine that is 8% alcohol by volume. Apart from some German wines, most wines are between 11% and 13.5% alcohol by volume. Many supermarket wines now state how many units of alcohol are contained in each 125 ml glass.
- In this window
- In a new window
Relative rates of lung cancer mortality over 21 years by units of alcohol consumed a week
Our brief survey in a large supermarket to assess their alcohol contents of a random selection of wines (table) shows that the actual number of units consumed in wine could be underestimated by as much as 37.5% per bottle for some types of wine, counting only 6 units of the possible 9.6 units consumed. This would have the effect of placing individuals in lower intake groups than they perhaps ought to be, and attributing to these groups health effects that are actually related to …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27