- W Dale Dauphinee, executive director (dauphine@mcc.ca)
- Medical Council of Canada, PB Box 8234, Station T, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1G 3H7
Editorial by Buckley
All approaches to revalidation ask doctors to prove their continuing competence to practise. This paper considers developments in Canada from two perspectives: what the profession and its regulatory bodies are doing to meet the challenge of maintaining doctors' performance, and the methods of assessment the regulatory bodies and agencies are using to address this issue. The two perspectives have led to two primary pathways: assessment related to practice activities but linked to an educational or enhancement feedback by the licensing bodies, and strategies emphasising the maintenance of good learning practices by the certifying bodies. The term revalidation is not widely used in Canada, but it can be defined as enforcing standards of practice in the medical workplace by direct measures of doctors' performance.
Methods
We reviewed the peer reviewed literature and publicly available documents describing either existing or proposed steps for the revalidation of medical licensure or certification and the maintenance of good medical learning practices in Canada. This generated a summary of the principal developments in policy and technical aspects, including a discussion of emerging challenges.
Overview of structures
Canada is a federation of 10 provinces and three territories. Health care is the responsibility of the provinces and territories. Though licensure of health professionals is a provincial matter, nationwide entry standards exist and are administered by national bodies: the Medical Council of Canada (basic medical qualifications) and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (specialists) and the College of Family Physicians of Canada (family medicine). These are recognised by all jurisdictions but one.1 National standards for the accreditation of hospitals exist, and provinces can participate in quality control through budgetary and utilisation reviews.

Role of licensure bodies
Peer review mechanisms
The medical licensing authorities have been monitoring doctors' practices for many years For example, Canada's three most populated provinces, British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec, …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27