Letters

Non-attendance at outpatients departments

BMJ 1999; 319 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7217.1134 (Published 23 October 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:1134

More information was needed for non-UK readers

  1. Susana Castan-Cameo, demonstrator ([email protected]),
  2. Janice Johnston, coordinator, expert subcommittee on grant applications and awards,
  3. Sarah McGhee, director of health services research group
  1. Department of Community Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  2. [email protected] Nuffield Institute for Health, University of Leeds, Leeds
  3. [email protected] 12 Barnfield Hill, Exeter EX1 1SR
  4. North and East Devon Health Authority, Southernhay East, Exeter EX1 1PQ
  5. University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR

    EDITOR—The trial by Hamilton et al1 examining the effect of giving patients a copy of their referral letter on non-attendance at outpatient departments raises several interesting and controversial issues, but it is difficult to assess for an international audience who may not be familiar with the British healthcare system. This issue of being international has been raised by others,2 and surely if the BMJ aspires to be an international journal, the research setting needs to be clarified for international readers.

    For example, what is the usual referral procedure in the United Kingdom? In Hong Kong a referral letter is always given to the patient and is required for access to secondary care. Patients make their own appointments. Hamilton et al also fail to establish the justification for the research under discussion.

    What was the rationale for this randomised controlled trial? They hypothesise that a lack of communication between the patient and the referring doctor is the cause of non-attendance. If so, how will a copy of the referral letter be expected to improve this communication or guarantee attendance? An explanation of the topic antecedents and justification of the research question are required together with a discussion of the cost implications of this intervention

    Although Hamilton et al quote a national (England or United Kingdom) non-attendance rate of 12%, their own study had a much lower non-attendance rate. The situation in Hong …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe