This article has a correction
Please see: Benzodiazepine use in pregnancy and major malformations or oral clefts
Induced abortions should be included
- Ester Garne, specialist in paediatrics,
- Ulf Bergman, visiting professor
- Eurocat, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Southern Denmark
- Bushey, Hertfordshire WD2 2NN
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham B15 7TG
EDITOR—Dolovich et al have reported their meta-analysis concerning use of benzodiazepines during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of oral clefts or major congenital malformations.1 In the cohort studies no increased risk of congenital malformations was found, while case-control studies showed an increased risk of both oral clefts and major congenital malformations. The authors excluded studies from the meta-analysis if only stillbirths or abortions were included.
The paper missed important information about the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. During the past 10-15 years prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformations has increased significantly in many countries and is often followed by termination of pregnancy if severe malformations are diagnosed.2 The Eurocat project is a European epidemiological programme surveying congenital malformations. The Eurocat registries are population based and based on multiple sources of information; they include information about live births, deaths of fetuses with gestational age ≥20 weeks, and induced abortions after prenatal diagnosis of malformations.
During 1990-4 there were 13 registries following strict Eurocat methodology and where induced abortion after prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformations was noted. The 13 registries covered 1 284 599 births. For this period the contribution of induced abortion in the registries …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012