Complementary medicine in conventional practice
BMJ 1999; 319 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7214.901 (Published 02 October 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:901- Catherine Zollman,
- Andrew Vickers
The past 10 years has seen a significant increase in the amount of complementary medicine being accessed through the NHS. These services are not evenly distributed, and many different delivery mechanisms are used, some of which (such as homoeopathic hospitals) predate the inception of the NHS. Others depend on more recent NHS reorganisations, like general practice fundholding and health commission contracting, or have been set up as evaluated pilot projects.
Integrating complementary medicine into conventional settings
Successful integration is more likely with
Demand from patients
Commitment from high level staff in the conventional organisation
Protected time for education and communication
Ongoing evaluation of service (may help to defend service in the face of financial threat)
Links with other conventional establishments integrating complementary medicine
Realism and good will from all parties
Jointly agreed guidelines or protocols between complementary and conventional practitioners
Support from senior management or health authority
Careful selection and supervision of complementary practitioners
Funding from charitable or voluntary sector
Problems are likely with
Financial insecurity
Time pressure
Lack of appropriate premises
Unrealistic expectations
Overwhelming demand
Inappropriate referrals
Unresolved differences in perspective between complementary and conventional practitioners
Real or perceived lack of evidence of effectiveness
Lack of resources and time for reflection and evaluation
List adapted from the report of the Delivery Mechanisms Working Party of the Foundation for Integrated Medicine
In general, development of these services has been demand led rather than evidence led. A few have published formal evaluations or audit reports. Some of these show benefits associated with complementary therapy—high patient satisfaction, significant improvements on validated health questionnaires compared with waiting list controls, and suggestions of reduced prescribing and referrals. However, data from other services are less clear, and many have not been formally evaluated These pilot projects have also identified various factors that influence the integration of complementary medicine practitioners within …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.