Letter

Are postal prompts really ineffective?

BMJ 1999; 319 doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.711 (Published 11 September 1999)
Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:711.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Richard Edwards, lecturer in public health medicine (P.R.Edwards@ncl.ac.uk),
  2. Paul Murphy, primary care information manager
  1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH
  2. Northumberland Health Authority, Morpeth

    EDITOR—Given the evidence presented in the POST study, a well designed cluster randomised trial, we were a little surprised that the investigators concluded that postal prompts to general practitioners have a “marginal role” in improving the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.1

    The authors found that recording and advice were significantly increased for all except one …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular