UK watchdog issues guidelines to combat medical research fraudBMJ 1999; 319 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7211.660 (Published 11 September 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:660
- Judy Jones
A group of UK medical journal editors has issued best practice guidelines to help stem research misconduct, a problem characterised by its chairman as “endemic” in the United Kingdom and the United States.
The guidelines, drawn up by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), are intended to promote and safeguard intellectual honesty at all stages in the research and publication cycle, from initial study design onwards.
Ethical approval, data analysis, competing interests, authorship, peer review, redundant publication, and editors' duties are among the key areas addressed. The guidance also advises editors on how to investigate suspected cases and what sanctions may be suitably applied when misdemeanours have been detected.
The committee …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial