- Bruce M Psaty, professor (psaty@u.washington.edu),
- Curt D Furberg, professor
- Cardiovascular Health Research Unit, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 88101, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
Provide evidence, progress, and an occasional missed opportunity
Education and debate p 630
This issue of the BMJ includes a summary of the new British Hypertension Society guidelines for managing hypertension.1 Recently, one of the authors of these guidelines commented on the strengths of the fifth and sixth reports of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC): “The JNC reports score highly on two counts—they took note of important new evidence, and unlike the others, delivered a clear message.”2 The same can be said of this version of the British guidelines, which represent an outstanding summary of the existing evidence about the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. In contrast to the World Health Organisation-International Society of Hypertension3 and the Joint National Committee VI guidelines,4 the brevity of this version will make the British Hypertension Society guidelines especially usefulto clinicians.
The authors aimed to produce an evidence based document, and in the full version (reference 1 in 1) they applied the North of England Group criteria to grade the evidence for most recommendations. For instance, a low dose thiazide diuretic is listed as the first line treatment for patients with uncomplicated hypertension. This evidence based recommendation, appropriately, received a grade A rating, which signifies evidence from at least one …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012