Letter

Follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina

BMJ 1999; 319 doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7206.380 (Published 7 August 1999)
Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:380

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Trial was underpowered

  1. John Robson, senior lecturer (j.robson@qmw.ac.uk)
  1. Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London E1 4NS
  2. University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford OX3 7LF

    EDITOR—The paper reporting the trial to improve follow up in general practice of patients with coronary heart disease after discharge from hospital is unduly pessimistic.1 At least one of the authors (Mant) has been in this situation before.

    Mant worked on the OXCHECK study, which found comparable differences of less than 5% between control and intervention groups and in which a strategy identifying patients at high risk was abandoned in favour of targeting those with established disease at yet higher risk.2 It was left to Field et al to show that the OXCHECK study was successful and that the incremental addition of assessment of multiple risk factors to a pre-existing programme targeting smoking and blood pressure was a cost effective way of improving risk factors.3 4

    The failure to show substantial differences in outcomes in both Jolly et al's trial and the OXCHECK study has resulted from flaws in the expectations and design of both trials. The trials are based on a prior assumption …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular