Author defends meta-analysis that was criticised

BMJ 1999; 319 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7204.256b (Published 24 July 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:256
  1. Francesco P Cappuccio, Reader in preventive cardiovascular medicine (f.cappuccio@sghms.ac.uk)
  1. St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE

    EDITOR—In their continuous and compelling search for faults in published research, Davey Smith and Egger have written a letter about meta-analysis that is inaccurate.1 In their reference to a meta-analysis of observational data that I and colleagues did2 and the reanalysis that followed3 the authors commit …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial