Author defends meta-analysis that was criticisedBMJ 1999; 319 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7204.256b (Published 24 July 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:256
- Francesco P Cappuccio, Reader in preventive cardiovascular medicine ([email protected])
- St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE
EDITOR—In their continuous and compelling search for faults in published research, Davey Smith and Egger have written a letter about meta-analysis that is inaccurate.1 In their reference to a meta-analysis of observational data that I and colleagues did2 and the reanalysis that followed3 the authors commit …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial