Editorials

What do hospital admission rates say about primary care?

BMJ 1999; 319 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7202.67 (Published 10 July 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:67

Their limitations suggest the need for more appropriate measures

  1. Raymond Jankowski, Honorary senior lecturer ([email protected])
  1. Department of Primary Care and Population Studies, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London NW3 2PF

    General practice pp 94, 98

    In its white paper on the English NHS the government has emphasised the need for an accountability framework against which to measure its objectives. A consultation document has suggested that health authorities should use performance indicators such as hospital admission rates as a measure of the quality of primary care.1 Yet two papers in this week's BMJ cast further doubt on hospital admission rates as a good measure of general practice performance.

    In the United States high hospital admission rates for chronic diseases like asthma, hypertension, congestive cardiac failure, chronic obstructive airways disease, and diabetes have been associated with lack of access to a primary care physician.2 In the United Kingdom substantial variation exists in admission rates among both health authorities 3 and general practices.4 Variation in general practitioner referral rates is correlated with subsequent variation in elective admissions.5 Given the continuing rise of both elective and emergency admissions in the United …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe