Information in practice

Computer support for recording and interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care (RAGs): qualitative evaluation with simulated patients

BMJ 1999; 319 doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7201.32 (Published 3 July 1999)
Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:32
  1. Jon Emery, Cancer Research Campaign primary care oncology research fellow (jon.emery{at}green.ox.ac.uk)a,
  2. Robert Walton, senior research fellowa,
  3. Andrew Coulson, research fellowb,
  4. David Glasspool, research fellowb,
  5. Sue Ziebland, senior research fellowa,
  6. John Fox, headb
  1. a ICRF General Practice Research Group, Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford OX3 7LF
  2. b ICRF Advanced Computation Laboratory, PO Box 123, London WC2A 3PX
  1. Correspondence to: J Emery
  • Accepted 26 March 1999

Abstract

Objectives: To explore general practitioners' attitudes towards and use of a computer program for assessing genetic risk of cancer in primary care.

Design: Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews and video recordings of simulated consultations.

Participants: Purposive sample of 15 general practitioners covering a range of computer literacy, interest in genetics, age, and sex.

Interventions: Each doctor used the program in two consultations in which an actor played a woman concerned about her family history of cancer. Consultations were videotaped and followed by interviews with the video as a prompt to questioning.

Main outcome measures: Use of computer program in the consultation.

Results: The program was viewed as an appropriate application of information technology because of the complexity of cancer genetics and a sense of “guideline chaos” in primary care. Doctors found the program easy to use, but it often affected their control of the consultation. They needed to balance their desire to share the computer screen with the patient, driven by their concerns about the effect of the computer on doctor-patient communication, against the risk of premature disclosure of bad news.

Conclusions: This computer program could provide the necessary support to assist assessment of genetic risk of cancer in primary care. The potential impact of computer software on the consultation should not be underestimated. This study highlights the need for careful evaluation when developing medical information systems.

Key messages

  • General practitioners are under increasing pressure to advise their patients about genetic predisposition to various diseases

  • Computers could help doctors to give genetic advice by simplifying the construction and assessment of family trees and implementing referral guidelines

  • This qualitative evaluation explored the context in which a computer program for assessing genetic risk of cancer would be used in general practice and issues surrounding its integration into a consultation

  • Most of the doctors found the program easy to use, but it affected their control of the consultation—because of their desire to share the computer screen with the patient and their inability to anticipate the information that would be displayed

  • The study identified important issues relating to the use of computers in consultations which may be of use in testing software for primary care in the future

Footnotes

  • Funding The Cancer Research Campaign funded this study. JE is funded by the Cancer Research Campaign. RW, SZ, and JF are funded by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund. AC and DG are funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and the Imperial Cancer Research Fund.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Accepted 26 March 1999

Rapid responses

THIS WEEK'S POLL

Read related article

See previous polls

BMJ most popular