A “free lunch” that could destroy the NHS
- Richard Smith, Editor
- BMJ
Education and debate p 48
“I see the private finance initiative in very simple and personal terms. At the moment i own a beautiful but outdated home in a prime position in Edinburgh, one of the world's loveliest cities. Now i'm going to ‘give it away’ at below market value in exchange for a smaller, unglamorous modern house on the edge of the city that doesn't have enough bedrooms and is hard to reach by public transport. Worse, i'll have to pay for it for 30 years—without any option of moving elsewhere. Worse still, we will have to reduce how much we do around the home in order to pay for the new building. Worst of all, my children will find themselves years from now in an outdated building in an awful position. They won't be able to afford either a new home or the services of the home. They'll have to buy them privately.”
This is the view of one doctor in the Royal infirmary of Edinburgh of what the private finance initiative (PFi) means to him, his colleagues, and his successors. His view may simplify some of the complexities of the initiative, but it's more true than untrue. The private finance initiative is a “smoke and mirrors” policy that may destroy the NHS.1–8 The complexity of it all has left many electors …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27