Correction to Dutch system of peer review is different and effective
Correction to South African government's response to AIDS crisis is sound
Correction to ECT was never used indiscriminately in early treatment of shell shock
Correction to Value of educational visits in obstetrics
At the end of the first paragraph of this letter by Peter Bourdillon (24 April, p 1143) the reference given (S van der Baan, conference of the Dutch Ear-Nose-Throat Society, March 1998) should have been: van der Baan S. Peer review: experiences of the Dutch Ear-Nose-Throat Society. In: CME—making sure it works. London: Department of Health, Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, 1998:62-4. (http://www.open.gov.uk/doh/meconf.htm).
Easy Read
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27