Letters

Rationing of sildenafil

BMJ 1999; 318 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7198.1620 (Published 12 June 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:1620

Nobody needs an erection at public expense

  1. Stephen Hayes ([email protected]), General practitioner
  1. Southampton SO30 2AA
  2. Hedon Group Practice, Hedon, East Yorkshire HU12 8JD

    EDITOR—I am a BMA member, but Drs John Chisholm and Ian Bogle do not speak for me on sildenafil (Viagra). 1 2 I understood that we had been asking successive governments for years to accept the need for explicit rationing decisions. As soon as this government makes one—a sensible one that the general public accepts—we kick it in the teeth.

    The grounds for differentiating between different causes of erectile dysfunction outlined by the health secretary, Frank Dobson, were imperfect but not unreasonable3; for the first time there was an overt admission that totally comprehensive demand-led care had to be limited. This was not the time to pick a fight. The media comment suggests that the public accepts that when resources are limited conditions such as cataract and stroke should be given higher priorities than erectile dysfunction.

    I have been telling my patients who request sildenafil that the NHS cannot afford it. I still take that view, but the BMA's reported comments will make my position harder to sustain. Sildenafil should be available at cost without prescription; it will cost about as much as an acceptable bottle of table wine.

    References

    True debate is needed

    1. Andrew Green ([email protected]), General practitioner
    1. Southampton SO30 2AA
    2. Hedon Group Practice, Hedon, East Yorkshire HU12 8JD

      EDITOR—The proposals for rationing of sildenafil (Viagra) put forward by the secretary of state are unethical,1 and the General Practitioners Committee is correct to advise general practitioners to prescribe the drug on prescription to all patients who require it.2

      Many doctors would welcome a mature debate regarding rationing in the NHS, recognising that in an underfunded service where rationing has always existed such a discussion should be held openly and honestly. Few, however, can have expected that the first politically …

      View Full Text

      Sign in

      Log in through your institution

      Free trial

      Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
      Sign up for a free trial

      Subscribe