Letters

Radiosurgery for brain tumours

BMJ 1999; 318 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7196.1489a (Published 29 May 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:1489

Editorial was wrong to denigrate radiosurgery so strongly

  1. C B T Adams, Consultant neurosurgeon
  1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Radcliffe Infirmary NHS Trust, Oxford OX2 6HE
  2. University Department of Neurosurgery, Graz, Austria

    EDITOR—Brada and Cruickshank criticise the use of radiosurgery in general and gamma knife radiosurgery in particular, apparently because of the lack of any controlled trials or robust case-control studies to show its efficacy.1 Of course controlled trials are desirable, but if treatments are withheld until data from such trials are available then few, if any, neurosurgical operations or conventional radiotherapy treatments would be carried out. David Forster and his team at Sheffield have reported studies of gamma knife radiosurgery for otherwise inoperable arteriovenous malformations and for acoustic neuromas.2 Is a controlled trial of radiosurgery needed when the end point is angiographically proved obliteration of the arteriovenous malformation or reduction of tumour volume as seen on magnetic resonance imaging? …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe