Insight through argument
BMJ 1999; 318 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7196.0 (Published 29 May 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:0Intense argument may be a route to understanding. Socrates, Marx (certainly Karl, and, for all I know, Groucho), and English law think it is. French law disagrees. Readers can make up their own minds as intellectual pugilists go head to head on two important issues: whether we should accept the Roman Catholic doctrine of “double effect”—that it is all right to kill patients if death is a side effect of an intention to relieve suffering; and what explains the “French paradox” whereby the French have unhealthy lifestyles yet low rates of heart disease.
Raanan …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.