Insight through argumentBMJ 1999; 318 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7196.0 (Published 29 May 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:0
Intense argument may be a route to understanding. Socrates, Marx (certainly Karl, and, for all I know, Groucho), and English law think it is. French law disagrees. Readers can make up their own minds as intellectual pugilists go head to head on two important issues: whether we should accept the Roman Catholic doctrine of “double effect”—that it is all right to kill patients if death is a side effect of an intention to relieve suffering; and what explains the “French paradox” whereby the French have unhealthy lifestyles yet low rates of heart disease.
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial