Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease

BMJ 1999; 318 doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7195.1419 (Published 22 May 1999)
Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:1419

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Effects of statins have been in addition to those of aspirin and

  1. Jonathan Morrell, Committee member, health care section of British Hyperlipidaemia Association
  1. Fitznells Manor Surgery, Ewell, Surrey KT17 1TF
  2. West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH

    EDITOR—Ferner acknowledges the apparent similarity between the abilities of continuing aspirin and simvastatin to prevent “bad things.”1 He overlooks the fact that the positive outcomes of the secondary prevention statin studies were additional to the use of both aspirin and β blockers according to the investigators' cardiological practices at the time (table).24 Since the inception of the Scandinavian simvastatin survival study over a decade ago, subsequent trials have tested lipid modification with statins against a background of increasingly optimal practice, comfortably exceeding that described in the survey by Campbell et al.5

    View this table:

    Percentages of patients in each study who were taking aspirin …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL