Authors ignored data in their study
- Jeffrey Milyo (jmilyo@tufts.edu), Postdoctoral fellow
- Health Policy Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
EDITOR—I take issue with Kennedy et al's conclusion that the frequently observed association between income inequality and health is not an artefact of an omitted relation between individual income and individual health.1 They had only limited information on individual incomes in their study. Furthermore, they ignored some of the income and inequality data that they did have available. Consequently, their conclusion that income inequality exerts an independent effect on individual health is inappropriate.
The authors controlled for individual income by using survey data on household income and controlling for household size. Their income data were categorical and so were necessarily measured with error. The top category was for households with incomes of ≥$50 000 (17.3% of the sample). Without explanation the authors combined this category with the category of households with an income of $35 000 to <$50 000 (another 15% of the sample). The authors also retained observations on people for whom …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27