Treatment of shoulder complaints in general practice: long term results of a randomised, single blind study comparing physiotherapy, manipulation, and corticosteroid injectionBMJ 1999; 318 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7195.1395 (Published 22 May 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:1395
- Jan C Winters (), general practitionera,
- Wim Jorritsma, specialist in manipulation medicineb,
- Klaas H Groenier, statisticiana,
- Jan S Sobel, general practitionera,
- Betty Meyboom-de Jong, professor of general practicea,
- Hans J Arendzen, specialist in rehabilitation medicineb
- aDepartment of Family Practice, University of Groningen, Ant Deusinglaan 4, 9713 AW Groningen, Netherlands
- bRehabilitation Centre Beatrixoord, Haren, Netherlands
- Correspondence to: Dr J C Winters, Nieuwe Schoolweg 2A, 9756 BB Glimmen, Netherlands
- Accepted 24 November 1998
Descriptive studies have shown that shoulder complaints can be persistent and recurrent, requiring long term evaluation of treatment.1 Unfortunately, in most randomised studies comparing treatments for shoulder complaints the study period varies from a few weeks (trials of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) to 3-6 months (injection therapy and physiotherapy trials).2–4)
In a trial in 1994-5 of treatment of shoulder complaints in general practice we showed that in a study period of 11 weeks, injection therapy with a corticosteroid was superior to physiotherapy and manipulative therapy in the patients whose complaints originated from the structures of the glenohumeral joint, the subacromial space, or the acromioclavicular joint (synovial group).5 In the patients whose complaints related to functional disorders of the cervical spine, the upper thoracic spine, or the adjoining ribs (shoulder girdle group), manipulation was superior to physiotherapy. To assess the various treatments in the long term, we re-examined these patients two to three years after the original study.
Patients, methods, and results
In September 1997 we sent a questionnaire to all 172 patients who had taken part in the earlier trial, inquiring about persisting, recurrent, or new shoulder complaints since the initial treatment. Diagnostic procedures and further treatment were assessed. We asked patients with current complaints to indicate if they felt “cured” and invited those who did not feel cured for a physical examination. Details about the assessment of the patients, the definition of the diagnostic categories, feeling cured, and the treatments given are described elsewhere.5 Statistical testing was done with the χ2test.
We received 130 (76%) questionnaires that could be evaluated. The distribution of the patients' characteristics across the five treatment groups was similar to the original study. A substantial proportion (64%) of the non-respondents had paid jobs. The table shows that 29/40 (73%) patients in the shoulder girdle group had experienced a shoulder complaint at some time since the earlier trial. Thirteen of the 22 (59%) patients in the physiotherapy group had current complaints, of whom 8 (62%) did not feel cured. In the manipulation group 6/18 (33%) patients had current complaints, of whom 4 did not feel cured. Most (18/19) patients with current complaints had had previous complaints. No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups for the items examined. Only two patients reported referral for specialist assessment.
In the synovial group 47/90 (52%) patients had experienced a shoulder complaint at some time since the earlier trial. Twenty two (24%) patients had current complaints, of whom 21 (95%) did not feel cured. Nineteen (21%) patients had consulted their general practitioner, and 12 (13%) patients were referred to a specialist, in most cases an orthopaedic surgeon. No significant differences were found between the three treatment groups for the assessed variables.
Of the 33 patients not feeling cured, 25 attended for a physical examination. Ten (40%) patients seemed to have changed diagnostic category.
The positive results of both injection therapy and manipulation versus physiotherapy in the original trial seemed to be short term effects. In the long term no significant differences between the various treatment groups were found. As many as half of the patients experienced recurrent complaints.
Shoulder complaints are not necessarily troublesome for all patients. Consequently, some patients feel cured despite their current complaints. Also, 64% of the non-respondents had paid employment; does this suggest that they were too busy to consider their shoulder complaint as anything more than minor?
The diagnostic categories of shoulder pain changed over time, which might be important for the therapeutic strategy.
Considering that a substantial proportion of patients with shoulder complaints experienced long term or recurrent complaints, new studies should analyse the factors that cause persistent shoulder complaints. Only with this knowledge can successful long term therapeutic strategies be developed.
We thank the rehabilitation centre Beatrixoord for giving us room and administrative facilities to conduct this study. We thank general practitioners Luit-Jan Lukkes, Henk Spelde, Mello Maaskant, and Jan Woudhuizen for their help in examining the patients and Siebring Schokker for entering the data into the computer.
Contributors: HJA and BMJ initiated the study. WJ did the overall coordination. WJ, JCW, JSS, and HJA collected the data. KHG did the statistical analysis. JCW wrote the article, with comments from the other authors, and will act as guarantor for the study.
Competing interests: None declared.