Education and debate

The World Bank and world health

Focus on South AsiaII: India and Pakistan

BMJ 1999; 318 doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7191.1132 (Published 24 April 1999)
Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:1132

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Kamran Abbasi, assistant editor. (kabbasi@bmj.com)
  1. BMJ, London WC1H 9JR

    This is the fifth in a series of six articles examining the World Bank's role in international health

    For a better understanding of the effectiveness of the World Bank's policies and of how they are perceived I visited bank projects in Bangladesh (see last week's article1), India, and Pakistan.

    Summary points

    India is the World Bank's largest single borrower, with cumulative loans over $44bn

    India's diversity, “enormous” burden of disease, and chronic underfunding of health care have hindered progress

    Despite Pakistan's relatively high gross national product per capita, its health indicators compare poorly with those of its neighbours

    Social action programmes, promoted by the bank, have been controversial

    Although the bank has adopted differing approaches to the countries of South Asia, the substantial challenges posed by the region mean that progress will be slow

    India: diversity and disease

    India's vastness, diversity, and poverty are challenges that the World Bank has responded to with huge sums of money. With cumulative loans of more than $44bn, India is the bank's largest single borrower. Even in fiscal year 1998 (from June 1997 to June 1998), when an exchange of nuclear tests with neighbouring Pakistan resulted in the temporary freezing of bank loans to the region, lending reached a record $3bn. India is also the recipient of the largest sum of interest free credits from the International Development Association. By April 1998, India had received 167 loans and 223 development credits, with 84 ongoing projects amounting to $14.5bn. Power projects accounted for 24% of lending, and health, nutrition, and population programmes received 14%. 2 3

    The states of India

    “The nuclear sanctions won't have greatly affected India,” argues Dr Anthony Measham, the bank's chief health adviser in the country. “Sanctions don't affect ongoing projects. The only ones that are affected are the new projects, and we are continuing all …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular