- Kamran Abbasi, assistant editor (kabbasi@bmj.com)
- BMJ, London WC1H 9JR
Editorial 822)
This the first in a series of six articles examining the World Bank's role in international health
“Masters of illusion” is how science writer Catherine Caulfield describes the World Bank, and she writes: “There is much truth in the saying that development is largely a matter of poor people in rich countries giving money to rich people in poor countries.”1 The bank has been highly criticised and has many staunch opponents, but in recent years its public image has softened, and it has become a powerful player in international health.
Summary points
The World Bank's aim is to reduce poverty by investing in people
The past decade has seen it change image from uncaring bully to compassionate stakeholder, focusing on health
It has displaced the World Health Organisation as the major influence behind health policy in poor countries because of its greater funding power
Critics argue that the World Bank and International Monetary Fund increase the debt burden of those countries least able to pay, and that debt relief would be the best way to eradicate poverty
Methods
For these articles, which attempt a critical portrayal of the bank, I visited its headquarters in Washington, DC, and interviewed leading policy makers, including the former director of the health, nutrition, and population sector, Richard Feacham, as well as the World Bank's vice president for Africa, Callisto Modavo. I interviewed bank employees and visited bank projects in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan, where my fluency in the local language was invaluable in speaking with politicians, civil servants, health workers, representatives of non-governmental organisations, journalists, and patients. I carried out a Medline search for articles under the heading “World Bank,” and read a wide selection of World Bank and government documents, from public policy documents to country reports.
Structure of the World Bank
The World Bank Group comprises …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27