Crisis in cremationBMJ 1999; 318 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7186.811a (Published 20 March 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:811
Poor form filling makes medical referees essential
- Clare Hawley, Medical referee.
- 6 Brookfield Avenue, Brookside, Chesterfield S40 3NX
- Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Bishop Auckland, County Durham DL14 6AD
- Cremation Society of Great Britain, Brecon House, Maidstone, Kent ME14 5DZ
EDITOR—I was one of the medical referees who received and completed Horner's questionnaire on cremation forms as part of the BMA survey in June 1997.1 I was interested to learn that only 21% of cremation certificates presented to Horner were complete, and this prompted me to survey the forms presented to me in Chesterfield.
From September 1997 I looked at 1000 consecutive sets of papers presented to me for authorisation of cremation. At the same time as starting the survey I produced a handout giving guidance on how to complete certificates B (completed by the attending doctor) and C (confirmatory certificate from independent doctor of 5 years' standing), which was distributed to all junior doctors at Chesterfield and North Derbyshire Royal Hospital. The table shows the papers received and numbers requiring intervention. Ninety seven forms had incomplete or incorrect details of name, address, or age; 64 had incomplete or incorrect details of pacemakers or radioactive implants; 39 required investigation of medical details; in 29 the patient had not been seen within 14 days of death; 24 had discrepancies in date, time, or place of death; 22 did not state whether the coroner was informed of the death; and …