- Manish M Gandhi, senior registrar in cardiology,
- Keith D Dawkins, consultant cardiologist
- Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD
- Correspondence to: Dr Gandhi
During the past five years there has been a sharp increase in the use of intracoronary stents as an adjunct to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for the revascularisation of patients with angina. In 1996 stents were used in half (mean 46%, range 15-99%) of the 20 500 PTCA procedures undertaken in the United Kingdom, representing a fivefold increase since 1994(HH Gray, personal communication).
Stents were developed to improve clinical outcome after PTCA. In selected patients, PTCA is as effective as bypass surgery,1 and more effective than medical treatment,2 in relieving angina. The early benefit of PTCA over medical treatment particularly applies to patients with severe angina and single vessel coronary artery disease at baseline. This benefit, however, diminishes during long term follow up and in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, partly because repeat revascularisation is required for restenosis. 3 4 In the early days after the first PTCA was performed in 1977, abrupt periprocedural closure of vessels and late angiographic restenosis were apparent.5 In an attempt to overcome these limitations, the first report of 24 coronary stents deployed in 19 patients was published 10 years later.6
Balloon catheter (a), and close up of tip with balloon mounted coronary stent (b)
Summary points
Intracoronary stents increase luminal diameter, seal intimal flaps, limit vessel recoil, and reduce vascular remodelling to provide a wider and smoother coronary lumen than balloon angioplasty alone
50-90% of coronary angioplasty procedures are followed by elective intracoronary stenting; this improves angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularisation for stable and unstable angina, reducing the need for repeat intervention
The role of intracoronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction remains unproved; it may be considered in selected patients when reperfusion with thrombolysis is contraindicated or fails
Randomised trials are under way to compare intracoronary …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27