If side effects are important, why are we so ignorant of the dose inhaled?
- Christopher O'Callaghan, Senior lecturer in child health,
- Peter Barry, Lecturer in child health
- Department of Child Health, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX
Inhaled steroids play an extremely important part in the treatment of asthma. They are now regarded as the first line prophylactic drug for adults1 and are used by many as a first line prophylactic agent for children. Important side effects are rarely seen in users of low dose inhaled steroids, but there is concern over the potential effects of high dose inhaled steroids. The Committee on Safety of Medicines has recently concluded that clinically important systemic adverse effects can occur at licensed doses of inhaled corticosteroids,2 the risks being increased after prolonged high dose therapy. Effects mentioned included adrenal suppression, osteoporosis or changes in bone mineral density, growth retardation in children, cataracts, and glaucoma. A major problem in trying to identify possible side effects—and, indeed, in assessing clinical trials of inhaled steroids—is determining the amount of drug patients have actually inhaled. Compliance and inhaler technique vary considerably, but even when these are optimal the dose of drug inhaled may vary by up to fourfold without the …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27