Minerva should not review retrospective audits

doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7180.400a

From trainee to consultant, BMJ Group offers doctors around the world tailored information, special events, learning resources and recruitment services at every step along their career path.

... by doctors, for doctors, for patients
We are open for entries!

Online learning

BMJ Learning

High-quality CME / CPD for doctors and other healthcare professionals. BMJ Learning features hundreds of accredited, peer-reviewed learning modules in text, video, and audio formats. Find out more

Courses and Qualifications

BMJ Masterclasses

BMJ Masterclasses, led by experts, help clinicians to use the latest evidence and recent guidelines in practice and meet their CPD/CME requirements. Find out more

Exam Preparation

The leading provider of online exam preparation, helping over 167,000 healthcare professionals to pass their exams. Find out more

onExamination

Search all BMJ comment articles:

From

Limit by

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Mark Hill, Consultant medical oncologist

Gastrointestinal Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT

EDITOR—The back page of the BMJ is one of the most widely read of the entire journal. I was therefore disappointed to read Minerva's review1 of a paper in Archives of Surgery about the management of oesophageal cancer.2 The statements that she made could not be justified on …