Letter

Any variability in outcome comparisons adjusted for case mix must be accounted for

BMJ 1999; 318 doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7176.128a (Published 9 January 1999)
Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:128.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. D F Signorini, Senior statistician. (dfs@skull.dcn.ed.ac.uk),
  2. N U Weir, Wellcome research fellow
  1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU

    EDITOR—Parry et al draw attention to the difficulties faced by those wishing to use comparative outcome data to indicate performance.1 They clearly show the importance of adjusting for differences in case mix and allowing for random variation by establishing 95% confidence intervals for estimates of adjusted outcome. In addition to the uncertainty in the observed mortality, however, there is uncertainty in the predicted mortality. The overall lack of clarity in the rankings of the neonatal intensive care units might therefore …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular