Letters

Any variability in outcome comparisons adjusted for case mix must be accounted for

BMJ 1999; 318 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7176.128a (Published 09 January 1999) Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:128
  1. D F Signorini, Senior statistician. ([email protected]),
  2. N U Weir, Wellcome research fellow
  1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU

    EDITOR—Parry et al draw attention to the difficulties faced by those wishing to use comparative outcome data to indicate performance.1 They clearly show the importance of adjusting for differences in case mix and allowing for random variation by establishing 95% confidence intervals for estimates of adjusted outcome. In addition to the uncertainty in the observed mortality, however, there is uncertainty in the predicted mortality. The overall lack of clarity in the rankings of the neonatal intensive care units might therefore …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe