Menu

 

Paper

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial

BMJ 1999; 318 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23 (Published 2 January 1999)
Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:23

Related articles

Head to Head: Is open peer review the fairest system? No

Published 16 November 2010; BMJ 341 doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6425

Editorial: Evidence based publishing

Published 17 August 2006; BMJ 333 doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7564.366

This Week In the BMJ: Open peer review is feasible and does not reduce quality of reviews

Published 2 January 1999; BMJ 318 doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.0d

Education and debate: Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen?

Published 2 January 1999; BMJ 318 doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.44

Editorial: Opening up BMJ peer review

Published 2 January 1999; BMJ 318 doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.4

See more

Endgames: Selection bias versus allocation bias

Published 24 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3345

Letter: BMJ shortlisted trial of Edwards-SAPIEN valve does not include all randomised patients

Published 22 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3229

Letter: Let’s act on the best available evidence on obesity

Published 22 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3015

This article has been cited by other articles:

Latest comments and most commented

THIS WEEK'S POLL

Read related article

See previous polls