- Peter Rubin, dean
- Dean's Office, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH
For most doctors prescribing a drug to a pregnant woman is like taking a journey through uncharted territory; navigation is made no easier by the darkness cast by “thalidomide's long shadow.”1 The usual benchmarks are absent because evidence from large clinical trials doesn't exist for drug treatment during pregnancy. Information on many drugs includes non-specific warnings along the lines of “not to be used in pregnancy unless the benefits outweigh the risks,” even though the benefits may not have been confirmed and the risks are not specified. Also, the disease being treated may affect or be affected by pregnancy. Nevertheless, at least a third of all pregnant women in the United Kingdom are prescribed at least one course of drug treatment.2 The purpose of this review is to summarise some of the important points that should be considered when prescribing drugs for pregnant women.
Summary points
Evidence about the effects and effectiveness of drug treatment during pregnancy is often circumstantial
All doctors who prescribe drugs for women of childbearing age must think about potential pregnancies before prescribing
Counselling before pregnancy is essential for all women receiving long term drug treatment
A useful treatment should not be stopped without good reason
Methods
For obvious ethical reasons there are few randomised and placebo controlled clinical trials designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drugs in pregnancy. Exceptions to this rule include studies of aspirin in the prevention of pre-eclampsia 3 4 and some small studies of antihypertensive agents. 5 6 Studies of drug treatment during pregnancy are usually done as retrospective analyses (performed by reviewing charts or monitoring prescriptions) or case reports. Case reports are important in recording alleged adverse effects but suffer from the weakness of being anecdotal evidence. The problem is that in 1-2% of all pregnancies in developed countries …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Health Literacy: Patient involvement and engagement with healthcare
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27