Are useful for clinicians but not yet for epidemiologists
- Andrew M Prentice, Head of energy metabolism
- MRC Dunn Clinical Nutrition Centre, Cambridge CB2 2DH
The body mass index (weight (kg)/(height (m)2)) is widely accepted as providing a convenient measure of a person's fatness. It gives an index that is broadly independent of height and equally applicable to men and women. A few individuals who are exceptionally muscular may be misclassified as overweight or obese, but otherwise the body mass index provides a rather robust index which has proved exceptionally useful for large scale epidemiological work. Its use is rapidly spreading into adult clinical medicine, where several charts and nomograms are available. Similar charts now exist for children, but their use is less straightforward.
For adults a pragmatic classification system exists based on associations between body mass index and all cause mortality.1 The recently redefined body mass index categories are: underweight <18.5; ideal 18.5-24.9; pre-obese 25.0-29.9; obese class I 30.0-34.9; obese class II 35.0-39.9; and obese class III >40 kg/m2. These fixed classifications are not appropriate for children, in whom the 50th centile for body mass index shows profound changes from birth through to early adulthood …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The word parameter is almost always wrong.
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 25 May 2012
Re: David Morrell
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illnesses
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Are we nearly there with tranexamic acid?
Published 25 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27