Unicef's baby friendly initiative is making great progress in UK
- Andrew Radford, Programme director,
- Cynthia Rickitt, Chair,
- Anthony Williams, Chair
- UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative, London WC1N 1DZ
- National Network of Breastfeeding Coordinators, Department of Health, London SE1 6LW
- COMA Panel on Child and Maternal Nutrition St George's Hospital, London SW17 0RE
- University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ
- Walsall Health Authority Walsall WS1 1TE
- University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka
- United Nations Fund for Population Activities, Sri Lanka
EDITOR —We share Malik and Cutting's enthusiasm for Unicef's baby friendly initiative in the United Kingdom but were disappointed that they did not acknowledge the great progress made over the past year.1 It is pessimistic to state that hospitals have been slow to work with the initiative. In fact, almost all units are working towards baby friendly accreditation; 11 British maternity units have achieved the required standard and another 40 have a certificate of commitment. Although Malik and Cutting suggest that hospitals might be demoralised by unachievable targets (such as the 75% breastfeeding rate required for the global baby friendly award), we removed this requirement for the United Kingdom's standard award in order to focus on the support and encouragement of best clinical practice.
It is also unfair to suggest that the baby friendly initiative is confined to hospitals. On 15 May we launched best practice standards for community healthcare settings, with the support of the minister for public health. This is the first step in introducing the initiative into the community and provides a framework around which clinical accreditation will be developed. The United Kingdom will probably be unique in having a primary care baby friendly award. As with the existing awards, particular emphasis is placed on support for mothers to make informed decisions about feeding their babies.
Malik and Cutting call for better coordination with existing groups that support mothers; in fact, all four national groups are fully involved with the baby friendly initiative. We were also puzzled by the statement …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Health Literacy: Patient involvement and engagement with healthcare
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27