Education And Debate

Marketing medicines through randomised controlled trials: the case of interferon

BMJ 1998; 317 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1231 (Published 31 October 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;317:1231
  1. Toine Pieters, lecturer ([email protected])
  1. Section of Medical History, School of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to: Dr T Pieters, Israelslaan 8-iv, 3582, HK Utrecht, Netherlands
  • Accepted 6 October 1998

“When it comes to clinical trials, few issues are simple. And many are controversial” wrote the Science correspondent Gary Taubes in 1995.1 Taubes' dictum seems to be at odds with the public model of the randomised clinical trial as a most helpful tool to relieve medical practice of that most feared element known to scientists and regulators: subjectivity. Are most doctors and regulators who firmly believe in the randomised controlled trial as the key to an “evidence based medicine” mistaken? Given an ideal world without social, professional, and economic interests affecting judgments of the efficacy and risks of medical treatments, one might have answered “no.” It is impossible, however, to conceive of such a trial taking place in a human vacuum. Conducting randomised controlled trials involves establishing links and commitments between many different individuals and organisations, including clinicians, laboratory researchers, patients and their families, regulators, and drug companies. In being shaped by the specific context of medical practice, clinical trials—even the most sophisticated randomised controlled trials—are not value-free measuring devices that objectively evaluate the efficacy of new treatments. Like any other medical device associated with our daily lives, randomised controlled trials incorporate the beliefs and ideas of the people who developed them and then are moulded by those implementing the methodology.2 I use here the story of interferon to illustrate the complexities surrounding the application of this supposedly value-free research methodology. Interviews referred to in the article were between myself and the person cited.

Summary points

Randomised clinical trials are regarded as a most helpful tool to relieve medical practice of subjectivity

Interferon became a part of everyday clinical practice through randomised clinical trials

Despite initial disappointment with its clinical efficacy, interferon became legitimised as a part of medical practice

Randomised clinical trials had the side effect of widening interferon's …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial

Subscribe