Intended for healthcare professionals

Papers

Factors affecting likelihood of applicants being offered a place in medical schools in the United Kingdom in 1996 and 1997: retrospective studyCommentary: League tables will helpCommentary: Some legal aspects arising from the study

BMJ 1998; 317 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7166.1111 (Published 24 October 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;317:1111

This article has a correction. Please see:

  1. I C McManus, professor of psychology and medical education. (i.mcmanus{at}ucl.ac.uk)
  1. Centre for Health Informatics and Multi-professional Education, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, Whittington Hospital Campus, London N19 5NF
  2. Medical Practitioners' Union, London SE1 1UN
  3. Gray's Inn, London WC1R 5AY
  • Accepted 5 October 1998

Abstract

Objective To assess the relation between a range of measures and the likelihood of applicants to medical schools in the United Kingdom being offered a place overall and at each medical school, with particular emphasis on ethnic minority applicants.

Design Data provided by the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service on 92 676 applications to medical schools from 18 943 candidates for admission in 1996 and 1997. Statistical analysis was by multiple logistic regression.

Main outcome measures Receipt of a conditional or unconditional offer of a place at medical school.

Results Eighteen separate measures were independently associated with the overall likelihood of receiving an offer. Applicants from ethnic minority groups were disadvantaged, as were male applicants, applicants applying late in the selection season, applicants making non-medical (so called insurance) choices, applicants requesting deferred entry (so called gap year), and applicants at further or higher education or sixth form colleges. Analysis at individual medical schools showed different patterns of measures that predicted offers. Not all schools disadvantaged applicants from ethnic minority groups and the effect was stable across the two years, suggesting structural differences in the process of selection. The degree of disadvantage did not relate to the proportion of applicants from ethnic minority groups.

Conclusions The data released by the Council of Heads of Medical Schools allow a detailed analysis of the selection process at individual medical schools. The results suggest several areas in which some candidates are disadvantaged, in particular those from ethnic minority groups. Similar data in the future will allow monitoring of changes in selection processes.

Footnotes

  • Accepted 5 October 1998

Commentary: League tables will help

  1. Aneez Esmail, vice president. (aneez.esmail{at}man.ac.uk)
  1. Centre for Health Informatics and Multi-professional Education, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, Whittington Hospital Campus, London N19 5NF
  2. Medical Practitioners' Union, London SE1 1UN
  3. Gray's Inn, London WC1R 5AY

      Commentary: Some legal aspects arising from the study

      1. Marie Demetriou, barrister.
      1. Centre for Health Informatics and Multi-professional Education, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, Whittington Hospital Campus, London N19 5NF
      2. Medical Practitioners' Union, London SE1 1UN
      3. Gray's Inn, London WC1R 5AY
          View Full Text