Evidence based practice can improve outcome
- Meryl Deane, Consultant in public health medicine.,
- David Crick, General practitioner.
- Tees Health Authority, Middlesbrough TS7 0NJ
- 723 Beverley High Road, Kingston-upon-Hull HU6 7ER
- University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW
- Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham NG7 2UH
- University of Keele, School of Postgraduate Medicine, Industrial and Community Health Research Centre, Hartshill, Stoke on Trent ST4 7QB
- ARC Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT
EDITOR —Croft et al describe 12 month outcome in low back pain.1 Their paper documents the disease course, but it is surprising that they do not describe patient management. The Royal College of General Practitioners has published evidence based guidelines for the management of acute back pain. 2 3 These guidelines recommend active management followed by manipulative treatment at 4-6 weeks if active management fails. An evidence based book for patients with back pain (The Back Book) was launched with the guidelines.4
We believe that evidence based management of acute back pain will improve outcome. While undertaking a prospective randomised controlled trial of manipulative treatment that aimed to compare the outcome of osteopathy and of physiotherapy we inadvertently showed the effectiveness of the college's guidelines. Two general practices in Kingston-upon-Hull participated in this study, with a total practice population of 15 000. Both practices are in deprived areas.
All patients presenting with acute non-specific back pain (defined as their first episode of back pain or an episode more than three months after a previous episode) were managed according to the college's guidelines; this ensured that patients in each arm of the trial were similar. Patients were advised on active management, minimal rest, early commencement of exercise, and rapid return to normal activity and work. All patients were given copies of The Back Book. They were advised to return if their symptoms deteriorated or if there was no improvement after three weeks. Patients returning to their general …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Health Literacy: Patient involvement and engagement with healthcare
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27