- Robin A Weiss, professor of viral oncology
- Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London SW3 6JB.
Imagine that your patient needs a transplant, say a new heart. A specially bred pig carrying human genes may soon supply it. That is the hope and hype of xenotransplantation, the transfer of animal cells, tissues, and organs to humans. Xenotransplantation is not entirely novel, as pig heart valves have been used for many years without apparent ill effect, but they are essentially inert tissue and seldom elicit rejection. There is now considerable excitement that the transplantation of live animal tissues may soon become a practical treatment option, although this is matched by concern over the risk of new zoonotic infections in transplant recipientsh.1 This article discusses the potential and the problems of xenotransplantation and explains why it faces an uncertain future.
Summary points
Transplantation of pig cells and tissues to treat diabetes and degenerative conditions such as Parkinson's disease and Huntington's chorea will become more common
Whole organ transplants from genetically modified pigs could make up the shortfall in human organs if immunological and physiological barriers can be overcome
Xenografts might be used as “bridging” organs to keep patients alive until human organs become available
The risk of zoonotic infections in xenotransplant recipients and their possible spread in the human population cannot be ignored—HIV and new influenza strains are thought to have started as zoonoses before becoming human pandemics
Clear ethical, safety, and monitoring guidelines are needed to control the development of xenotransplantation
Meeting the need
Figure 1shows the imbalance between the supply and demand for organ transplants, with the largest waiting by far being for kidney transplants. Furthermore, the need for organ donors will continue to rise as more patients and new diseases are deemed eligible for treatment by transplantation. Even if opt out policies were adopted (in which people are assumed to consent unless they state otherwise) the supply of …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Evidence Based Medicine-Boondoggle?
Published 8 February 2012
Wills and wishes in organ donation
Published 8 February 2012
Re: Lessons from America
Published 8 February 2012
Boosting the role of low-molecular-weight heparins in primary PCI
Published 8 February 2012
Re: Should UK membership exams be held overseas? Yes
Published 8 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Wakefield sues BMJ over MMR articles (5 responses)
Published 10 Jan 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (5 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012