Use of the READER method of critical appraisal in general practiceBMJ 1998; 317 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7161.819 (Published 19 September 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;317:819
Study did not properly answer the questions it posed
- Johannes C van der Wouden, Research coordinator (email@example.com)
- Department of General Practice, Room Fe319, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Hillhead Family Practice, 33 Stewarts Road, Belfast BT11 9SZ
EDITOR—Critical reading is becoming increasingly important in an era of abundance of information. MacAuley et al have undertaken an admirable job by studying one method of critical appraisal of medical literature.1 However, I do not think that their study properly answered the questions that it posed.
The apparent strength of this READER method is its simplicity. The method has several drawbacks, however. Items are not independent. When relevance is absent in the eye of the reader, little energy will be invested in assessing the methodological qualities of the paper.
Serious problems arise in the “discriminative” component of the checklist. Here we …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial