This article has a correction
- Martin Eccles (Martin.Eccles@ncl.ac.uk), professora,
- Julie Clarke, general practitionerb,
- Moira Livingston, consultantc,
- Nick Freemantle, senior research fellowd,
- James Mason, research fellowd,
- for the North of England Evidence Based Dementia Guideline Development Group
- aCentre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA
- bDepartment of Primary Health Care, School of Health Sciences, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH
- cPsychiatry of Old Age Service, North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields NE29 8NH
- dCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO1 5DD
- Correspondence to: Professor Eccles
- Accepted 23 April 1998
Other members of the guideline development and project groups are listed at the end of the paper.
This guideline aims to provide recommendations to assist general practitioners manage people with all forms of dementia and help their carers. This is a summary version of the full guideline.1 The areas covered were developed in conjunction with the guideline development group. They were felt to reflect areas that were important in daily clinical practice. The guideline is for the management of patients with dementia; although it covers the area of screening instruments, it is not meant to cover the area of differential diagnosis. All recommendations are for general practitioners and apply to patients attending general practice with dementia. The development group assumes that doctors will use their knowledge and judgment in applying the principles and recommendations given below in managing individual patients, since the recommendations may not be appropriate for all circumstances. Doctors must decide to adopt any particular recommendation in the light of available resources and the circumstances of individual patients. Throughout this guideline categories of evidence (cited as I, II, or III) and the strength of recommendations (A, B, C, or D) are as described in previous method papers and the full version of the guideline. 1 2 A summary of categories of evidence and strength of recommendations is given in the box.
Summary points
In general practice, dementia has an incidence of 1.6, a prevalence of 3.6, and a workload of 7.4 consultations per year
General practitioners should use formal cognitive testing as well as clinical judgment in diagnosing dementia
The impact of caring depends on factors such as behaviour and affect more than on the severity of the cognitive impairment
Search strategy and synthesis
The search strategy was carried out using Medline (covering 1966-96), BIDS-EMBASE(1980-96), and PsycLIT (1974-96). Searches were limited to English …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012