This article has a correction
- Martin Eccles (Martin.Eccles@ncl.ac.uk), professora,
- Julie Clarke, general practitionerb,
- Moira Livingston, consultantc,
- Nick Freemantle, senior research fellowd,
- James Mason, research fellowd,
- for the North of England Evidence Based Dementia Guideline Development Group
- aCentre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA
- bDepartment of Primary Health Care, School of Health Sciences, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH
- cPsychiatry of Old Age Service, North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields NE29 8NH
- dCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO1 5DD
- Correspondence to: Professor Eccles
- Accepted 23 April 1998
Other members of the guideline development and project groups are listed at the end of the paper.
This guideline aims to provide recommendations to assist general practitioners manage people with all forms of dementia and help their carers. This is a summary version of the full guideline.1 The areas covered were developed in conjunction with the guideline development group. They were felt to reflect areas that were important in daily clinical practice. The guideline is for the management of patients with dementia; although it covers the area of screening instruments, it is not meant to cover the area of differential diagnosis. All recommendations are for general practitioners and apply to patients attending general practice with dementia. The development group assumes that doctors will use their knowledge and judgment in applying the principles and recommendations given below in managing individual patients, since the recommendations may not be appropriate for all circumstances. Doctors must decide to adopt any particular recommendation in the light of available resources and the circumstances of individual patients. Throughout this guideline categories of evidence (cited as I, II, or III) and the strength of recommendations (A, B, C, or D) are as described in previous method papers and the full version of the guideline. 1 2 A summary of categories of evidence and strength of recommendations is given in the box.
Summary points
In general practice, dementia has an incidence of 1.6, a prevalence of 3.6, and a workload of 7.4 consultations per year
General practitioners should use formal cognitive testing as well as clinical judgment in diagnosing dementia
The impact of caring depends on factors such as behaviour and affect more than on the severity of the cognitive impairment
Search strategy and synthesis
The search strategy was carried out using Medline (covering 1966-96), BIDS-EMBASE(1980-96), and PsycLIT (1974-96). Searches were limited to English …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27