- Melvin J Silverstein (melsilver9@aol.com), medical director
- The Breast Center, 14624 Sherman Way, Van Nuys, CA 91405, USA
- Correspondence to: Dr M J Silverstein, University of Southern California, Norris Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Room 7415A, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
Ductal carcinoma in situ is a proliferation of malignant epithelial cells within the ductolobular system of the breast that show no light microscopic evidence of invasion through the basement membrane into the surrounding stroma (fig 1). Several forms of histological architecture are recognised, the most common of which are comedo, cribriform, solid, micropapillary, and papillary.
Until recently, ductal carcinoma in situ was a relatively uncommon disease, representing only about 1% of all newly diagnosed cases of breast cancer.1 It was usually regarded as a single disease with a single treatment, namely, mastectomy. Most patients presenting with ductal carcinoma in situ had symptoms—a palpable mass or discharge from the nipple. During the past decade, as mammography has become more widely used and technically better, the number of new cases has increased dramatically. Most patients now present with lesions that are not palpable and are clinically occult. Furthermore, the notion of ductal carcinoma in situ as a single disease has evaporated. It is now well recognised as a heterogeneous group of lesions with a diverse malignant potential. As our understanding of the disease has evolved and the range of treatment options has widened, the process of making decisions about management has become more complex and controversial. Ductal carcinoma in situ has become so common and so confusing that the first textbook devoted solely to the disorder was not published until 1997.2
Summary points
Cases of ductal carcinoma in situ have increased appreciably as mammography has improved and pathologists are becoming more familiar with minimal lesions
Ductal carcinoma in situ is a heterogeneous group of lesions, and no singleapproach to treatment is suitable for all patients
Although radiotherapy is recommended after lumpectomy, this may not be necessary in all subgroups of patients
The Van Nuys prognostic index combines scores for three prognostic factors; …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27