Editorials

First trimester ultrasound screening

BMJ 1998; 317 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7160.694 (Published 12 September 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;317:694

Carries ethical and psychological implications

  1. Anne McFadyen, Senior lecturer,
  2. Julia Gledhill, Honorary research fellow,
  3. Barry Whitlow, Clinical research fellow,
  4. Demetrios Economides, Senior lecturer
  1. Leopold Muller Department of Child and Family Mental Health
  2. University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free Campus, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London NW3 2PF

    Letters p 748

    Ultrasound scanning has been an integral part of antenatal care in industrialised countries for some time,1 but until recently detection of fetal abnormalities by this method has been possible only in the second trimester. High resolution scanning during the first trimester is now possible and is routine in some units. Not only chromosomal abnormalities but also structural anomalies can be diagnosed by this means,2 and the advent of such a capability raises both ethical and psychological issues.

    While healthcare professionals in maternity services are good at giving some sorts of information to patients—for example, on nutrition during pregnancy—they may fail to consider the issues of informed consent raised by the use of such a powerful diagnostic tool during routine antenatal care. 3 4 Most women being offered these scans are at low risk of fetal abnormality and the scan constitutes their first visual encounter with their baby. They may believe that it will provide information only about gestational age and be unaware of the range of abnormalities that can be detected. Recent research suggests that many women are not told beforehand of …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe