Effectiveness of the postcoital test: randomised controlled trial

BMJ 1998; 317 doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7157.502 (Published 22 August 1998)
Cite this as: BMJ 1998;317:502
  1. S Guid Oei, gynaecologista,
  2. Frans M Helmerhorst (helmerhorst{at}rullf2.medfac.leidenuniv.nl), senior lecturerb,
  3. Kitty W M Bloemenkamp, registrarb,
  4. Frederieke A M Hollants, medical officerb,
  5. Debbie E M Meerpoel, medical officerb,
  6. Marc J N Keirse, professorc
  1. aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saint Joseph Hospital, 5500 MB Veldhoven, Netherlands,
  2. bDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
  3. cDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flinders University of South Australia
  1. Correspondence to: Dr Helmerhorst
  • Accepted 13 May 1998

Abstract

Objectives : To investigate the impact of the postcoital test on the pregnancy rate among subfertile couples and on the number of other diagnostic tests and treatments.

Design : Randomised controlled study.

Setting : A university and two non-university teaching hospitals in the Netherlands.

Subjects : New couples at infertility clinics, 1 March 1993 to 1 October 1995; randomisation to an intervention group (series of infertility investigations that include the postcoital test) or to a control group (series excluding the test).

Main outcome measure : Cumulative pregnancy rate.

Results : Of 736 consecutive new couples, 444 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and consented to participate (intervention group, 227; control group, 217). Treatment was given more often in the intervention group than in the control group (54% v 41%; difference 13% (95% confidence interval 4% to 22%)). Yet cumulative pregnancy rates at 24 months in the intervention group (49% (42% to 55%)) and the control group (48% (42% to 55%)) were closely similar (difference 1% (−9.0% to 9.0%)).

Conclusion : Routine use of the postcoital test in infertility investigations leads to more tests and treatments but has no significant effect on the pregnancy rate.

Footnotes

  • Funding Financial support was received from the participating institutions only.

  • Conflict of interest None.

  • Accepted 13 May 1998

THIS WEEK'S POLL