- S Guid Oei, gynaecologista,
- Frans M Helmerhorst (helmerhorst{at}rullf2.medfac.leidenuniv.nl), senior lecturerb,
- Kitty W M Bloemenkamp, registrarb,
- Frederieke A M Hollants, medical officerb,
- Debbie E M Meerpoel, medical officerb,
- Marc J N Keirse, professorc
- aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saint Joseph Hospital, 5500 MB Veldhoven, Netherlands,
- bDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
- cDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flinders University of South Australia
- Correspondence to: Dr Helmerhorst
- Accepted 13 May 1998
Abstract
Objectives : To investigate the impact of the postcoital test on the pregnancy rate among subfertile couples and on the number of other diagnostic tests and treatments.
Design : Randomised controlled study.
Setting : A university and two non-university teaching hospitals in the Netherlands.
Subjects : New couples at infertility clinics, 1 March 1993 to 1 October 1995; randomisation to an intervention group (series of infertility investigations that include the postcoital test) or to a control group (series excluding the test).
Main outcome measure : Cumulative pregnancy rate.
Results : Of 736 consecutive new couples, 444 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and consented to participate (intervention group, 227; control group, 217). Treatment was given more often in the intervention group than in the control group (54% v 41%; difference 13% (95% confidence interval 4% to 22%)). Yet cumulative pregnancy rates at 24 months in the intervention group (49% (42% to 55%)) and the control group (48% (42% to 55%)) were closely similar (difference 1% (−9.0% to 9.0%)).
Conclusion : Routine use of the postcoital test in infertility investigations leads to more tests and treatments but has no significant effect on the pregnancy rate.
Footnotes
-
Funding Financial support was received from the participating institutions only.
-
Conflict of interest None.
- Accepted 13 May 1998
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: The comforts of spiritualism
Published 23 May 2012
Re: The hardest thing: admitting error
Published 23 May 2012
Ice cream headache as a new example of “Cold headache” in Avicenna’s manuscript
Published 23 May 2012
Re: Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial seriesCommentary: Larger trials are needed
Published 23 May 2012
Re: Testing athletes, and banning those who take drugs, is unjustifiable
Published 23 May 2012
Most responses
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (6 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32