Decision analysis and the implementation of research findingsBMJ 1998; 317 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7155.405 (Published 08 August 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;317:405
- R J Lilforda, professor of health services research,
- S G Paukerb, professor,
- D A Braunholtza, senior research fellow,
- Jiri Chardc, research associate
- aDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT
- bDepartment of Medicine, New England Medical Centre, Tufts University, 750 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, USA
- cMRC Health Services Research Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR
- aCorrespondence to: Professor Lilford [email protected]
This is the sixth in a series of eight articles analysing the gap between research and practice
Series editors: Andrew Haines and Anna Donald
Evidence based medicine is more than just reading the results of research and applying those results to patients because patients have particular features that may make them different from the “average” patient studied in a clinical trial.1There are two types of differences. The first type of differences comprise those that affect probability (for example, the probability that treatments will have the same absolute or relative effects as those measured in the trial). The second type of differences comprise those values (or utilities) that affect how much of a side effect a person is prepared to trade off against the positive advantages of treatment.
Thus it is necessary for doctors to relate the results from a trial to their particular patient. Health professionals usually do this intuitively, but formal decision analysis provides an intellectual framework for developing an explicit decision making algorithm which can be criticised and improved. Although, currently, time constraints make it unrealistic to conduct a separate decision analysis for each patient, computer programs may soon help overcome this problem. It is, however, feasible for decision analyses to be done for categories of patients with similar clinical features and personal utilities. The results of such generic decision analyses provide a sound basis for developing clinical guidelines. Decision analysis thus provides a rational means of allowing health professionals to move from finding evidence to implementing it.
Decision analysis reconciles evidence based medicine with patients'preferences
Decision analysis uses Bayesian probabilities together with values assignedto different outcomes to determine the best course of action
Although it is currently unrealistic to do a separate decision analysis foreach patient, computer programs may soon overcome this problem
In the …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial