- Michael Portillo, cabinet minister, Conservative government 1992–7. (mportillo@kmg.com)
- 75 Davies Street, London W1Y 1FA
This paper is an edited extract from the Royal College of Nursing Kathleen A Raven Lecture given at the Royal College of Surgeons on 10 June 1998
At the conclusion of the second world war Britons wanted a new order of things. Medical care had made big advances in the war, and soldiers had been offered a higher standard of care than they were likely to encounter after demobilisation. Civil servants and politicians discerned these currents long before the war ended.
Following the war, therefore, Britain would almost certainly have created a national health service without Aneurin Bevan, and even without a Labour government. Bevan had to work with the conditions he inherited and he accepted much that had been planned during the wartime coalition government. He made relatively few big decisions, but those that he made have had a profound effect on the way the service has developed.
Bevan held fast to the principle of a service funded by the taxpayer, and essentially by no other source, and his resignation from the cabinet on the issue of health charges had the effect of raising that principle to the status of a dogma. That has been an important cause of the strain experienced by the health service ever since. It has been refused sufficient funds from the taxpayer, and has never had anywhere else to turn for money. Worse, sensible discussion of alternatives has been made almost impossible ever since Bevan turned the National Health Service into a party political battleground.
Summary points
After the war Britain would probably have created a national health service without Aneurin Bevan. He made relatively few big decisions, but those he did make had a profound effect on the way the NHS developed
His decision to nationalise the hospitals led to the government supplying virtually all …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012