Mini-mental state examination may not test cognitive function adequately
- Pete Forster, Fourth year medical student,
- Emma Heckford, Fourth year medical student,
- Claire Huckler, Fourth year medical student,
- Nicole Keong, Fourth year medical student,
- Ahmed Al-Khabaz, Fourth year medical student
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH
- Medical Unit for the Acute Care of the Elderly, Poliambulanza Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Geriatric Evaluation and Rehabilitation Unit, Richiedei Hospital, Gussago, Brescia
- Geriatric Research Group, 25122 Brescia
- Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital Leiden, P-3-Q, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
- Clinical Epidemiology Leiden, University Hospital Leiden, Leiden
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
EDITOR—Gussekloo et al hypothesised that mild cognitive impairment as determined by the Dutch version of the mini-mental state examination discriminates subjects with a higher risk of mortality.1
We have concerns about the validity of using the mini-mental state examination as an adequate test of cognitive function. We have doubts about the reproducibility of test scores if the test is administered by different physicians. In clinical practice the mini-mental state examination is well recognised as being a useful guide rather than an absolute measure of cognitive function; it is a subjective test with variable results.
In particular, we think that defining the scores for mild cognitive impairment and normal cognitive function so close together, at 24–27 and 28–30 respectively, is a potential source of bias. A subject could fall into either category, depending on several variables affecting alertness, such as time of day, timing of drug treatment, stress, and discomfort.
The authors conclude that this test “seems to be useful as a screening instrument for mild cognitive impairment, and its scores may act as an important predictor of survival in very elderly people.”1 Although this conclusion …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Health Literacy: Patient involvement and engagement with healthcare
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27