Revised guidelines advocate two doses of anti-D immunoglobulin for antenatal prophylaxis
- Douglas Lee, Consultant in transfusion medicine
- National Blood Service Lancaster, PO Box 111, Lancaster LA1 4GT
- Department of Child Health, Queen's University of Belfast, Institute of Clinical Science, Belfast BT12 6BJ
- Belfast City Hospital, Belfast BT9 7AB
EDITOR—In his editorial van Dijk advocates routine antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin of all pregnant women who are RhD negative and refers to the consensus conference at the Royal College of Physicians in Edinburgh in April 1997.1 He states that two dose schedules were considered—two doses of 500 IU of anti-D immunoglobulin, one at 28 weeks' gestation and the other at 34 weeks, and one dose of 1000 IU given between 28 and 30 weeks—both options being equally effective. He implies that the second option reflects Bowman's practice in Canada.2 Bowman's programme in fact uses a dose of 1500 IU given at 28 weeks; maternal anti-D immunoglobulin concentrations are then monitored and additional anti-D immunoglobulin is given at around 36 weeks to those …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Health Literacy: Patient involvement and engagement with healthcare
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27