This article has a correction

Please see: Miscellaneous

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

The UN convention needs an enforcing arm

  1. David Southall, Consultant paediatrician,
  2. Abbasi Kamran, Editorial registrar
  1. North Staffordshire Hospital Centre, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 6QG (cai_uk@compuserve.com)
  2. BMJ

    Once wars and other conflicts begin, children suffer abuse—physical, sexual, and emotional. This is despite international laws to protect them.1 Recent studies on the psychological consequences of armed conflict have shown that the resultant unhappiness and mental disturbance is so great in children that it can rarely be repaired.2 4 The answer therefore has to be prevention, and, if that fails, the international community needs to act rapidly to protect vulnerable children.

    In conflicts over the past 10 years 90% of casualties have been civilians. Two million children have been killed and 4–5 million seriously injured (usually without analgesia, anaesthesia, or surgical facilities to treat them). Twelve million children have been made homeless, over one million orphaned, and countless psychologically traumatised. Three quarters of deaths from antipersonnel mines are among children.

    United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (International Law in 1990)

    In accordance with their obligations under International Humanitarian laws in armed conflicts, States Parties shall take all feasible measures to ensure protection and care of children who are affected by an armed conflict.—Article 38, pt 4

    Inequalities in health care, and the poverty in which a …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL