- Simon Chapman
- associate professor, department of public health and community medicine University of Sydney, Australia
News p 881
Simon Chapman examines the recent newspaper reports which stated that passive smoking does not cause cancer and asks where the spin is coming from
“The truth is rarely pure, and never simple,” railed the editorial writer from the Sunday Telegraph on 8 March, forgetting to acknowledge Oscar Wilde. Oh yes, they were on to a good one. The spin doctors down at British American Tobacco (BAT) had passed the newspaper an exclusive: “Passive smoking doesn't cause cancer—official.”
According to the piece, the World Health Organisation's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) had discovered that environmental tobacco smoke was just epidemiological hot air. But worse still, the infamous nanny factory, “whose institutional raison d'etre is to interfere as widely as possible in the day to day life of as many people as possible,” had been caught by BAT trying to withhold this embarrassing stuff from us all, slipping it discreetly into a few paragraphs in their biennial report. The Sunday Times picked up the story from an …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27